Of course, it’s not CNN’s fault.
They just report the news, after all. It’s what’s happening in the news these days that has made me
so completely irate.
Here’s what I mean:
Everyday I check my CNN app.
I’ve been thankful to have it when big news stories were breaking—like the
Trayvon Martin decision and the royal baby’s birth. (Hey, shut up. It was big
news for some of us.) But lately, the news I’ve been reading on my CNN app is at
best making me want to stick my fingers in my ears and yell “LA LA LA! I CAN’T
HEAR YOU!” and is at worst filling me with the aforementioned white-hot burning
rage.
Mostly, it’s the rage.
For example, here is a
screenshot of what I saw on my phone today:
From top to bottom, here’s what
we have: victim blaming, rapist sympathy, blatant ignorance, the New York
Times, and homophobia.
I didn’t read the New York Times
article, and I don’t think it would make me mad. So let’s not worry about that
one.
But let’s go ahead and talk
about the others.
First of all, let’s talk about “Girl raped, kills self; rapist gets 30 days.” Let’s talk about that one.
Because, seriously, WHAT IN THE ACTUAL F*CK CAN BE GOING ON IN OUR COUNTRY THAT
THIS CAN HAPPEN?
Here’s the gist of this
disturbing story: A 49-year-old high school teacher entered into a sexual
relationship with a 14-year-old student.
Wait a minute. Stop. That right
there seems to me to be all you need to know, right? An adult in a position of
power had sex with a child. A CHILD. Doesn’t seem that complicated to me.
Sadly, there’s more: The teacher
was charged and as the case progressed, the victim committed suicide—apparently
at least in part because of the emotional fallout she suffered from the assault
and its aftermath.
Please please please get the
full details at CNN, but after some ups and downs, the case came before
a judge on Monday. Prosecutors asked for a 20-year sentence for the teacher,
who had previously admitted to one of the rape charges. The judge sentenced him
to 15 years in prison.
Seems like the least he could
do, right?
But then? THEN? Then he
suspended all but 30 days of the sentence.
That’s right. The 49-year-old
male teacher who had sex with his 14-year-old student will spend just 30 days
in jail. Because the judge said that, in taped interviews, the girl seemed “older
than her chronological age” and seemed to have had “as much control of the
situation” as her teacher did.
As tragic as it is that the girl
took her own life, it really shouldn’t matter to the case. Even if she had overcome this
awful period of her life—gone on to college, fallen in love, married, built a
career, had children—even THEN it wouldn’t change the facts of the case. She
was raped. Her rapist should be punished, severely. And 30 days in jail does
NOT count as “severely.” Not even close.
(And if it turns out that we can
be judged not by our chronological age but by the age we act, then I should
either be able to shop at Forever 21 again or qualify for an AARP discount at
the movies, depending on the day. But neither is actually possible, because my
chronological age is forty and that’s the ONLY AGE I HAVE!)
*Blogger takes a deep cleansing
breath and starts to let go of the rage…*
*But then she looks at this
picture again*
What else do we have here? For
one, the Hannah Anderson article. In it, the sister of the 40-year-old man
who allegedly kidnapped 16-year-old Hannah has said that the girl was
“trouble,” and that she believes her brother is, in fact, the victim.
I. Just. Can’t.
It does seem that there are
undisclosed details of this case that may explain more about the relationship
between these two and what happened, and I can’t blame DiMaggio’s sister for
demanding more information from the authorities. But to me it boils down to
this: She is 16. He was 40. Unless she willingly went camping in the Idaho
wilderness with him (while wearing pajama pants, no less), then SHE is the
victim.
That one makes me mad, but we’ll
just have to wait and see how angry I feel when all the details of the case
finally emerge.
What’s next? How about this:
Nine children and seven adults, all of whom have ties to a Texas mega-church
that preaches against immunization, have been stricken by measles. Many of them
had never been immunized. The church’s senior pastor said this about their
stand against immunizations: “The concerns we have had are primarily with very
young children who have family history of autism and with bundling too many
immunizations at one time."
Just. Please. Stop.
Then go ahead and read this here
article HERE that says, once again, that there are no scientifically
proven ties between vaccines and autism.
Finally, we have the Cory Booker story. Booker is the mayor of Newark, NJ, and is running for the state’s U.S.
Senate seat. Apparently, there are people out there who wonder whether Booker
is straight or gay. Booker told The Washington Post this week that he responds
to questions about his sexuality by saying, in essence, “Who cares?” NOT “I’m
straight, but who cares?” and NOT “I’m gay, but who cares?” Just plain old,
“Who cares?” I love this, because by answering the question he’d be implying
that his sexual orientation somehow mattered and had some bearing on his
ability to govern. And, of course, it doesn’t.
Well, wait a minute. That’s not
rage. Where’s the rage?
Here it is: Booker’s rival,
Republican Steve Lonagan, thinks Booker’s remarks are “weird.” He says, “As a
guy, I personally like being a guy. I don’t know if you saw the stories last
year. They’ve been out for quite a bit about how [Booker] likes to go out at
three o’clock in the morning for a manicure and pedicure,” a practice that
Lonagan called a “fetish.”
Please. Make. All. Of. This.
Stop.
So, a man is gay because he gets
manis and pedis? Wait…not just gay, but a fetishist??? AND the fact that Cory
Booker gets manis and pedis is A) newsworthy to some people, and B) relevant to
his ability to govern?
RRRRRRAAAAAAAAGE!
Well, Booker may not always
comment on his sexuality, but he has fully admitted to getting manis and pedis.
And he has said that both are great but pedis, especially, are
“transformative.”
Well, duh. But this is still NOT
NEWS and still DOES NOT SPEAK TO HIS ABILITY TO GOVERN.
*sigh*
Oh, crap. I just thought of
something. If a man who gets manicures must
be gay, then a woman who never gets
manicures must also be gay, right?
Shhhh…no one tell my husband our
marriage is a sham. My ragged fingernails are proof.